Legislature(2005 - 2006)
05/24/2005 05:41 PM Joint 073
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB73 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 73-STATE VIROLOGY LABORATORY
CHAIR GARY WILKEN called the Conference Committee on SB 73
meeting to order at 5:41:59 PM. All members were present.
5:42:48 PM
CHAIR WILKEN said they would start by comparing the two versions
with the help of a spreadsheet. He noted there were three groups
of differences and reviewed them. Lines 2,3,4 and 13 were agreed
upon. The remainder of the differences was in two groups, the
first had to do with bond indebtedness for school debt
reimbursement.
SENATOR HUGGINS moved to delete references to items
6,7,8,9,10,11 and 12 - the Grant Anticipation Revenue Vehicle
(GARVEE) issues that were added in the House.
SENATOR GUESS objected to taking the GARVEE issues out unless
Lake Otis and Tudor were put back into the capital budget.
REPRESENTATIVE MEYER agreed with that position.
SENATOR GUESS maintained her objection.
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Kelly and Meyer and
Senators Huggins and Wilken voted yea and Representative
Gruenberg and Senator Guess voted nay. Therefore the references
to GARVEE bonds were removed.
5:47:36 PM
SENATOR HUGGINS moved to adopt CCS SB 73, version S, as the
working document.
SENATOR GUESS objected for discussion.
5:50:07 PM
SENATOR WILKEN asked if there were any questions, knowing that
they would discuss debt reimbursement in section 4. There were
no questions. Section 4 was reflected in the spreadsheet. Lines
2 on page 8 through line 15 on page 9 listed various projects in
organized Alaska that totaled $191,900,000. He asked Eddy Jeans,
Director of School Finance if he could authorize any three
projects for Fairbanks as long as they didn't exceed $20
million.
EDDY JEANS, Director, School Finance, Department of Education
and Early Development (DEED),replied that was correct.
5:53:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MEYER said that half the committee represents
Anchorage that gets almost $62 million. He asked if Anchorage
could use $50 million of that money for rebuilding Clark Junior
High.
MR. JEANS replied it could.
SENATOR GUESS asked if the projects in AS 14.07.020(a)(11) have
to be approved or reviewed in reference to language on page 6,
lines 4 and 13.
MR. JEANS replied that projects have to be reviewed by the
department to meet space eligibility guidelines to receive
reimbursement funding. It's a two-step approval process, one by
the local voters and one by the Department of Education.
SENATOR GUESS asked if a project could be reimbursed if it is
not submitted to the department and has not been reviewed.
MR. JEANS replied that projects must submit applications to the
department to review and make a determination on what the
eligible reimbursable amount is.
SENATOR GUESS asked if there is a deadline for submitting an
application.
5:57:45 PM
MR. JEANS answered that applications can be submitted any time
prior to October 31, 2006 to be eligible.
5:58:30 PM
SENATOR GUESS asked how major maintenance and school
construction levels are determined.
CHAIR WILKEN explained that the projects in this bill came out
of three other bills and one of the other bills covered all the
bonded indebtedness on the major maintenance list. To pass his
muster, the Governor required this bill to show some fiscal
constraint and that was done by limiting the time and amounts.
6:00:09 PM
SENATOR GUESS said she understands the time limits, but not the
amount limits, because traditionally reimbursement is not done
that way. She asked the logic behind it.
CHAIR WILKEN replied the concept of 60/40 and 70/30 was first
established during the 2003 Legislature. The 60/40 had a much
less stringent bar for the voters. That, in addition to the
normal bonded indebtedness, adds up to about $752 million in
current obligations increasing the debt service by 90 percent
between 2004 and 2005. The department wants a time-out from
issuing more debt.
MR. JEANS agreed and pointed out that the prior two
authorizations under the debt program had allocation limits
similar to this bill's. The 2003 House bill opened the debt
program and added the $700 million.
6:02:59 PM
SENATOR GUESS said she knows why they broke from tradition three
years ago and asked why they are continuing with the 60/40
approach if that is seen as a problem.
CHAIR WILKEN responded that it has been useful for the people
who have chosen to use it and he didn't really know why.
REPRESENTATIVE MEYER said this whole process has been one of
compromise and related that the Senate originally wanted to use
the Amerada Hess bonding, but the House did not like that method
and preferred to continue the current program that was
established in HB 13. However, the Governor said they have too
much debt. Limiting the time and amount was a compromise that he
agreed with.
REPRESENTATIVE MEYER asked if Anchorage were to have an election
for Clark Junior High or one of the other projects, how long
would it be before they were actually given the money to do the
construction.
MR. JEANS explained the way it works is that they must get voter
and DOE approval. When the bonds are actually issued is up to
the borough or municipality. Then they start receiving
reimbursement, which is typically twice a year. The catch here
is the district has to submit a notice to the department in
October of what their anticipated bond reimbursement needs will
be for the subsequent year, so that can be built into the
department's budget that it brings to the Legislature. He has a
zero fiscal note for 2006 because no one can notify him of what
their needs would be nor would they be able to get it approved
by the voters and issued to qualify for any reimbursement in
2006.
How much of these actually get approved and the state
starts reimbursing in 2007 is a wild guess. I mean
some of the bonds that were actually approved by the
voters in the last go-around still have not been
issued. So, they're still not in our system yet. But
they will be coming on board in the next year or two.
REPRESENTATIVE MEYERS asked if the debt the state incurs on
Clark Middle School could be spread out over a five-year period.
MR. JEANS replied that the minimum a bond can be issued for is
10 years; they are at about 15 years right now.
6:06:30 PM
CHAIR WILKEN reported that 43 percent of the 2003 budget was
60/40 money. It has made a difference and may be continued.
6:08:54 PM At ease 6:10
CHAIR WILKEN asked Senator Guess if she maintained her objection
to adopting CCS SB 73, Version S.
SENATOR GUESS withdrew her objection and without further
objection Version S was adopted.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG offered Amendment 2 to CCS SB 73 for
discussion.
24-GS1117\FAA.9
Mischel
11/17/05
A M E N D M E N T 2
OFFERED IN CONFERENCE BY REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG
TO: CCS SB 73, Draft Version S
Page 8, line 2:
To sec. 4, AS 14.11.100(q)(1):
Add $51,000,000 to the existing number.
Page 8, line 5:
To sec. 4, AS 14.11.100(q)(2)(A):
Add $51,000,000 to the existing number.
6:09 At ease 6:10
CHAIR WILKEN objected for discussion purposes.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG explained that the $51 million is for
Clark Middle School, which is the top priority for the Anchorage
school district. It is in both his and Senator Guess' district.
The roof is failing and the building needs to be torn down and a
whole new school built. The project can't be phased. He is
afraid if they wait, the cost will go up and will cost local
taxpayers and the state more money.
REPRESENTATIVE MEYER commented that he understands this school
is important and he didn't get it into the original SB 155,
because $50 million would have sunk the whole bill. That might
have been a mistake, because those projects ended up getting
included in the capital budget and being on this list. He
thought other maintenance could be postponed or that the project
could be phased. He explained that the House didn't go along
with using the Amerada Hess earnings, because it wanted to keep
the flexibility to use that sum for priorities in any given
year. He thought that next year it should be used for debt
retirement and he hoped the program could be continued. He asked
Representative Gruenberg for his support on that issue.
6:14:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG hoped the they would be able to do part
of the project this year under this cap, but the Superintendent
told him the way the program is configured, that can't be done.
That's why he offered the amendment. He didn't seem to have a
choice.
6:15:18 PM
SENATOR HUGGINS remarked that some schools are being done in
phases. He thought that was Anchorage's choice.
6:15:35 PM
CHAIR WILKEN said he opposed amendment 2 because the
administration requested fiscal constraint. This issue could be
revisited once Mr. Jeans reports to them next year on the
results of the program. He said the report indicates out of that
$720 million, Anchorage has $370 million in the pipeline for
about 50 projects. They have enough to get through another
season and the issue can be revisited next year.
6:17:18 PM
SENATOR GUESS explained that Anchorage normally does phase its
schools and she trusts the superintendent's call on not being
able to phase this project. She explained that Anchorage has a
lot of schools and different areas have different growth needs.
A roll call vote was taken on Amendment 2. Representative
Gruenberg and Senator Guess voted yea; Representative Kelly and
Meyer and Senator Huggins and Chair Wilken voted nay; and
Amendment 2 failed.
6:20:11 PM At ease 6:20:38 PM
SENATOR HUGGINS moved to adopt Amendment 1.
24-GS1117\S.1
Mischel
11/17/05
A M E N D M E N T 1
OFFERED IN THE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE BY SENATOR WILKEN
TO: CCS SB 73, Draft Version "S"
Page 6, line 13, following "section":
Insert ";
(15) subject to (h), (i), (j)(2) - (5), and (r)
of this section, and after projects funded by the bonds,
notes, or other indebtedness have been approved by the
commissioner, 90 percent of payments made by a municipality
during the fiscal year for the retirement of principal and
interest on outstanding bonds, notes, or other indebtedness
authorized by the qualified voters of the municipality on
or after June 30, 1999, but before October 31, 2006, to pay
costs of school construction, additions to schools, and
major rehabilitation projects and education-related
facilities that exceed $200,000, are approved under
AS 14.07.020(a)(11), meet the 10 percent participating
share requirement for a municipal school district under
AS 14.11.008(b), and are not reimbursed under (n) or (o) of
this section"
Page 6, line 23:
Delete "(a)(8) - (14)"
Insert "(a)(8) - (15)"
Page 7, line 30:
Delete "a new subsection"
Insert "new subsections"
Page 8, line 2:
Delete "191,900,000"
Insert "177,256,000"
Page 8, lines 26 - 28:
Delete all material.
Reletter the following paragraphs accordingly.
Page 9, lines 10 - 12:
Delete all material.
Reletter the following paragraph accordingly.
Page 9, following line 15:
Insert a new subsection to read:
"(r) The total amount of school construction projects
approved for reimbursement by the department under (a)(15)
of this section
(1) may not exceed $14,644,000;
(2) after June 30, 1999, and until October 31,
2006, shall be allocated as follows:
(A) $6,522,000 to projects in a
municipality with a public school enrollment of at
least 1,925 but less than 2,025 students in fiscal
year 2005, as determined under AS 14.17.500;
(B) $8,122,000 to projects in a
municipality with a public school enrollment of at
least 398 but less than 400 students in fiscal year
2005, as determined under AS 14.17.500."
CHAIR WILKEN objected for discussion and asked Mr. Jeans to
explain it.
MR. JEANS said that it was brought to his attention that there
were actually two districts on the school debt reimbursement
list that qualified for 90 percent state funding with a 10
percent local match under the grant program. This amendment
offers them 90 percent reimbursement under the debt program.
6:22:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG asked if the Northwest Arctic district
would be able to participate in this.
MR. JEANS replied that he understands that Northwest Arctic is
at bonding capacity and will not be able to get bonds through
the municipal bond bank at this point in time.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG asked if there is anything else the
committee could do that would allow it to participate.
MR. JEANS replied no, not through this program.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG said the authorization will remain and
if they can later qualify by lowering their debt, they can take
advantage of it.
MR. JEANS responded:
As long as that happens prior to October 31, 2006....
They could actually get voter approval and department
approval prior to October 31, 2006 and sell the bonds
in a year or two after that. So there is an
opportunity; I'm not saying that I know for a fact
that they would be able to do that.
6:24:53 PM
SENATOR GUESS said this is a big deal because they get $6.5
million, but then they can't bond for it. She asked if he was
certain they could do everything before October 31, 2006.
MR. JEANS replied that he can't make an assurance that bonding
will allow anybody to bond. This legislation simply allows
municipalities to go to the voters for approval.
REPRESENTATIVE MEYER added if they get approval by October 31,
but don't have their finances in place for another two or three
years after that, are they still able to get reimbursed.
MR. JEANS replied that they have up to three years after
approval.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG asked if any schools are in that
position now.
MR. JEANS answered that a number of schools have voter approval
but haven't sold bonds yet, but the reason is not because they
can't get the financing.
CHAIR WILKEN removed his objection and without further
objection, Amendment 1 was adopted.
6:27:57 PM
SENATOR GUESS asked if any other school districts on the list
are at the cap or would be over the cap with this.
MR. JEANS replied that he was not aware of any.
SENATOR GUESS asked if any school districts fall into the
working draft that aren't represented on the list.
MR. JEANS said no, but he would double-check.
6:29:04 PM
CHAIR WILKEN found no further discussion.
6:30:09 PM
SENATOR HUGGINS moved to report CCS SB 73 [version S as amended]
and attached fiscal notes from committee with the understanding
that limited powers of free conference were needed. There were
no objections and it was so ordered. There being no further
business to come before the committee, Chair Wilken adjourned
the meeting at 6:31:36 PM.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|